Case Competition · Simon Business School · April 2026

Redefining Wealth Management
for the Next Generation

A 5-year growth and transformation strategy for Simon Private Bank — a top-tier global private wealth manager facing a generational shift, a margin crisis, and an immediate talent departure.

Role
5-Year Financial Model
Team
Manaswini · Saeed · Christo · Aditya · Kartik
Deliverable
Financial projections · Scenario analysis · Assumptions model
Outcome
Competed · Panel feedback received

"Strong ideas and rigorous analysis — the financial thinking was sound. The opportunity was in translating complex models into the clear, simple narrative that C-suite audiences expect from consultants."

— Panel Feedback · Simon Financial Industry Case Competition 2026
The Problem
SPB faced three simultaneous threats
28.4%
Operating Margin · FY25

Below the 30% floor. Revenue growing but costs outpacing it — a structural margin problem hiding in plain sight before the crisis hit.

10.8%
Millennials in client base

54% of clients are Boomers. The $84T intergenerational wealth transfer is underway and SPB has almost no next-gen relationships built.

25%
AUM managed by departed SVPs

Two Senior VPs left to launch a competing boutique. $577.5B under management. Clients prepared to move within the month.

The Immediate Crisis

The VP departure exposed a structural flaw — client relationships were tied to individuals, not the institution. $12.7–17.7B in AUM was at direct solicitation risk within 30 days, with 93% of all revenue concentrated in just 1,494 UHNW clients.

$12.7–17.7B
AUM at direct solicitation risk
from sample-based calculation
93%
Revenue from UHNW clients
— extreme concentration risk
$70–99M
Annual revenue at risk
at 126.7 bps effective ROA
Four pillars. One coherent narrative.
I

Defend the Core

Stability & Retention
  • C-suite personally calls at-risk UHNW clients within 48 hours
  • Hard cap: no advisor manages more than 15% of firm AUM
  • Deferred equity + Rainmaker bonus to lock top-30 advisors
  • LAS on fixed income collateral — makes clients structurally harder to poach
II

Win Next-Gen Clients

Acquisition & Growth
  • SPB Digital sub-brand for Millennials/Gen X aged 25–45
  • Three-tier model: Core (UHNW), Select (HNW), Digital ($500K+)
  • Target wealth inheritors of existing UHNW clients first
  • Alternatives access — 183 bps vs 52 bps fixed income
III

Evolve the Model

Products & Pricing
  • Hybrid fees: AUM base + subscription layer on top
  • Alternatives mix shift: 13% → 20% of AUM by FY30
  • AI advisory copilot — one advisor serves 2–3× more clients
  • Ancillary revenue: LAS, FX, family office services
IV

Sustain Profitability

Efficiency & Margin
  • 30% margin floor restored FY26 — crisis year above target
  • Hiring freeze FY26 only; comp resumes +4.5%/yr from FY27
  • Tech investment +$200M FY26, +$300M FY27 (peak build)
  • Costs grow 22% while revenue grows 79% — operating leverage
Stress case: 7% market return · $26.5B crisis loss · FY26–FY30
AUM by FY30
$3.94T
+70% vs FY25
Revenue FY30
$52.4B
+79% vs FY25
Operating Margin FY30
50.9%
vs 28.4% FY25
Margin Floor FY26
32.4%
Crisis yr — above 30% floor ✓
Metric FY25A FY26E FY27E FY28E FY29E FY30E 5-Yr CAGR
Total AUM ($T) $2.31T $2.50T $2.80T $3.14T $3.52T $3.94T +11.3%
Revenue ($B) $29.3B $31.9B $36.1B $40.8B $46.2B $52.4B +12.3%
Operating Costs ($B) $20.9B $21.6B $22.8B $23.7B $24.7B $25.7B +4.2%
Operating Income ($B) $8.3B $10.3B $13.3B $17.1B $21.5B $26.7B +26.3%
Operating Margin 28.4% 32.4% 36.9% 41.9% 46.5% 50.9% ✓ ≥30%
AUM Growth

7% blended market return + 2.5% organic NNM + 2.5% next-gen acquisition. Crisis loss of $26.5B absorbed by $161B+ in market appreciation in FY26 alone.

Revenue Growth

Base AUM fees drive 98% of growth. ROA improves from 126.7 → 132 bps as alternatives mix shifts from 13% → 20%. Subscription + LAS diversify from FY27.

Cost Discipline

Hiring freeze FY26 only. Comp resumes +4.5%/yr from FY27. Total costs grow 22% over 5 years vs revenue growing 79% — the source of margin expansion.

Scenario Analysis

Four scenarios modelled: Conservative (5.5% mkt, $12.7B loss) through Severe (5.5% mkt, $26.5B loss). 30% margin floor holds in every scenario from FY26 onwards.

Regulatory · Competitive · Operational

Regulatory

Non-Solicitation & Non-Compete
HIGH

Engage outside counsel immediately. File injunctions if departed SVPs contact SPB clients. Monitor all client communications.

Digital Product Suitability
MED

AI advisory must comply with SEC/FINRA fiduciary standards. Annual algorithm audit required. Robust KYC/AML for digital onboarding.

Cross-Border Risk (EMEA/APAC)
MED

Local counsel review before digital platform launch per jurisdiction. Separate data residency architecture for GDPR compliance.

Competitive

Boutique Firm Poaching
HIGH

Differentiate on institutional scale and product breadth. Boutiques cannot replicate SPB's alternatives shelf or global reach.

FinTech & RIA Disruption
MED

SPB Digital sub-brand captures digital-native clients. Strategic partnership with WealthTech (Addepar, Orion) accelerates build.

Fee Compression Industry-Wide
MED

Subscription tier and alternatives fees structurally protect margin from AUM fee compression. Revenue diversification is the hedge.

Operational

Advisor Concentration Risk
HIGH

Hard cap: no advisor manages more than 15% of firm AUM. Team-based coverage. Succession plan for every advisor with $500M+ book.

Technology Execution Risk
MED

Phased platform build with MVP in 90 days. Fallback: partner with Envestnet or SEI if build delays emerge. Dedicated CTO-led squad.

Brand Dilution
LOW

SPB Digital is a distinct sub-brand with no co-branding with core SPB. Clear firewall. Core UHNW brand untouched.

What I Learned

The ideas were right. The delivery needed work.

The panel noted our analysis was rigorous and our strategy was well-reasoned — but that we needed to translate it more simply for a C-suite audience. That's the lesson I'm carrying forward.

01
Simplify before you present

A financial model with four scenarios and 6 sections is thorough. A C-suite audience needs one number, one chart, one takeaway. Lead with the answer.

02
Consultants frame, not just analyze

The insight isn't the model — it's the story the model tells. "30% margin floor is never breached again after FY25" is a story. A table of numbers is not.

03
Defend your assumptions cold

Every number has a source. Every assumption has a rationale. Being able to explain the methodology under pressure — that's what separates good analysis from great consulting.

The crisis wasn't existential — but it exposed what could become one.

Our core thesis was that the SVP departure, while painful, was not a terminal event for SPB. The bank's fundamentals — $2.31T in AUM, deep UHNW relationships, and a globally recognized brand — were intact. The real danger wasn't the immediate crisis. It was the possibility of arriving at a similar situation again: concentrated client relationships, advisor dependency, and a business model that hadn't evolved for the next generation of wealth.

01
Stabilize first, then transform

We separated the 30-day crisis response from the 5-year structural fix. Retain at-risk clients immediately, then rebuild the model so no single advisor departure can threaten the firm again.

02
The margin problem was structural, not cyclical

28.4% operating margin below the 30% floor wasn't caused by the crisis — it existed before it. Costs were outpacing revenue growth. The solution had to address cost discipline and revenue diversification simultaneously.

03
Next-gen is the growth engine, not a side project

With 54% of clients being Boomers and the $84T wealth transfer underway, SPB needed a digital-first strategy for Millennials and Gen X — not as a defensive move, but as the primary growth driver for the next decade.

04
Never arrive at this situation again

Hard caps on advisor AUM concentration, team-based coverage models, and institutional stickiness through lending and alternatives access — all designed to make the firm resilient to individual departures permanently.

← Back to Portfolio